|
Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun |
---|
September | September | 1 - Decision day
All day 2025.10.01 The trial panel of the Special Appeals Chamber, composed of judges, Sokol Çomo as presiding judge, Ina Rama case rapporteur, Albana Shtylla, Mimoza Tasi, Natasha Mulaj as members, announced the decision on case no. 22/2024, dated 07.06.2024, pertaining to the appeal of the assessee Milan Laskaj filed against the decision of the Independent Qualification Commission, no. 748, dated 27.03.2024. In conclusion of the review of the case in camera, the trial panel, pursuant to article 66, paragraph 1, item “b” of law no. 84/2016, “On the transitional re-evaluation of judges and prosecutors in the Republic of Albania”, unanimously ruled on: Amendment of decision no. 748, dated 27.03.2024 of the Independent Qualification Commission and confirmation in office of the assessee Milan Laskaj. This decision is final and effective immediately. Announced in Tirana, today on 01.10.2025. - Announcement
All day 2025.10.01 On Wednesday, 29.10.2025, at 10:00, the Special Appeals Chamber shall review in camera the case (JR) no. 24/2023, dated 05.06.2023, corresponding to the appeal filed by the assessee Besnik Shehu against the decision of the Independent Qualification Commission no. 641, dated 06.04.2023. The trial panel for the review of this case is composed of judges: Presiding judge: Ina Rama Case Rapporteur: Mimoza Tasi Members: Natasha Mulaj, Rezarta Schuetz, Sokol Çomo The hearing in camera shall be held at the premises of the Special Appeals Chamber, at: Bulevardi “Dëshmorët e Kombit”, nr. 3, Tirana. ************ On Tuesday, 28.10.2025, at 10:00, the Special Appeals Chamber shall adjudicate in public hearing the case (JR) no. 47/2023, dated 19.10.2023, corresponding to the appeal of the Public Commissioner filed against the decision of the Independent Qualification Commission no. 689, dated 24.07.2023 rendered for the assessee Ervin Pollozhani. The trial panel for the adjudication of this case is composed of judges: Presiding judge: Ina Rama Case Rapporteur: Albana Shtylla Members: Mimoza Tasi, Rezarta Schuetz, Sokol Çomo The public hearing shall be held at the premises of the Special Appeals Chamber, at: Bulevardi “Dëshmorët e Kombit”, nr. 3, Tirana.
| 2 - Camera hearing
All day 2025.10.02 On Thursday, 02.10.2025, at 10:00, the Appeal Chamber shall consider in camera case (JR) no. 31/2023, dated 17.07.2023, pertaining to the appeal of the assessee Armand Gurakuqi against decision no. 652, dated 28.04.2023 of the Independent Qualification Commission. The trial panel of this case shall consist of the following judges: Presiding: Natasha Mulaj Rapporteur: Albana Shtylla Members: Ina Rama, Mimoza Tasi, Sokol Çomo The hearing in camera shall take place at the premises of the Appeal Chamber, at Boulevard “Dëshmorët e Kombit”, no. 3, Tirana.
| 3 | 4 | 5 |
6 - Public hearing
All day 2025.10.06 On Monday, 06.10.2025, at 10:00, the Appeal Chamber shall consider in a public hearing case (JR) no. 42/2024, dated 28.10.2024, pertaining to the appeal of the Public Commissioner against decision no. 779, dated 28.06.2024 of the Independent Qualification Commission, related to the assessee Aurel Zarka. The trial panel of this case shall consist of the following judges: Presiding: Natasha Mulaj Rapporteur: Mimoza Tasi Members: Albana Shtylla, Rezarta Schuetz, Sokol Çomo The public hearing shall take place at the premises of the Appeal Chamber, at Boulevard “Dëshmorët e Kombit”, no. 3, Tirana. - Public hearing
All day 2025.10.06 The Appeal Chamber held on 23.09.2025, at 10:00, the public hearing of case (JR) 55/2023, dated 24.11.2023, pertaining to the appeal of the Public Commissioner against decision no. 704, dated 09.10.2023 of the Independent Qualification Commission, related to the assessee Elidon Hysenaj. The presiding judge announced that Article 179/b, paragraph 8 of the Constitution of the Republic of Albania and Article 199, second paragraph, of the Civil Procedure Code has set forth the transfer of powers from the Public Commissioner to the Head of the Special Prosecution Office, represented in this case upon special authorization by the prosecutor of the Special Prosecution Office Mr. Klodian Braho, present at the hearing. During the submission of the appeal grounds on the proficiency assessment criterion, the representative of the Head of the Special Prosecution Office stated that, contrary to decision of the Independent Qualification Commission, the evidence in the case file is insufficient to assess whether the assessee reaches a reliable level for confirmation in office, and that it is necessary the verification of this data at the source, at the law enforcement agencies. Referring to the criminal proceedings administered by the assessee, Mr. Braho stated that the undertaking of investigative actions by him remains clearly unsubstantiated and requested the Chamber to decide alternatively, as a result of the new evidence that shall be administered during this proceedings, the amendment of decision no. 704, dated 09.10.2023 of the Independent Qualification Commission or its upholding. As to the the public complains, the representative of the Head of the Special Prosecution Office stated that they contain no circumstances to impact the case. In disputing the appeal grounds, the assessee maintained that the claims of the representative of the Head of the Special Prosecution Office do not stand and are not supported on the evidence included in the criminal files of the administered cases. Mr. Hysenaj provided detailed explanations regarding the investigative actions undertaken for each of the criminal proceedings included in the appeal and filed new acts, which he requested the trial panel to collect as evidence. Regarding the complaints, the assessee stated that he shares the same position with the representative of the Head of the Special Prosecution Office. After being consulted, the trial panel decided: - To open the judicial investigation and accept as evidence the acts filed by the assessee, according to the inventory of today’s hearing and the letter from SPAK dated 12.09.2025, submitted by him recently.
- To be directly acquainted with the classified information, made known also to the Independent Qualification Commission within the framework of the case, at the law enforcement institutions that administer it.
- As to the denunciations, the trial panel, relying on the positions of the parties with their regard, as well as on the acts submitted by the assessee, held not to continue with further investigation, as not found in terms of Article 53 of Law no. 84/2016.
In the context of this decision-making, the trial panel decided to postpone the hearing to 06.10.2025, at 13:00, inviting the parties to be prepared for the final conclusions. The public hearing shall take place at the premises of the Appeal Chamber, at Boulevard “Dëshmorët e Kombit”, no. 3, Tirana.
| 7 - Public hearing
All day 2025.10.07 On 17.09.2025, the Appeal Chamber held the hearing in camera of case with registration number (JR) 3/2024, dated 18.01.2024, pertaining to the appeal of the assessee Blerina Muço against decision no. 711, dated 01.11.2023 of the Independent Qualification Commission. Following the consideration of the case in camera, the trial panel, pursuant to Article 51, paragraph 1 (b) of Law no. 49/2012 “On administrative courts and the adjudication of administrative disputes”, as amended, decided to transfer the trial of this case in a public hearing, for an accurate and complete ascertainment of the factual situation related to the payment of tax obligations for the income generated by the assessee’s related person (spouse). The public hearing shall take place on Tuesday, 07.10.2025, at 09:30. The trial panel of this case consists of judges: Presiding: Sokol Çomo Rapporteur: Natasha Mulaj Members: Albana Shtylla, Mimoza Tasi, Rezarta Schuetz The public hearing shall take place at the premises of the Appeal Chamber, at Boulevard “Dëshmorët e Kombit”, no. 3. Tirana.
| 8 | 9 - Camera hearing
All day 2025.10.09 On Thursday, 09.10.2025, at 10:00, the Appeal Chamber shall consider in camera case (JR) no. 16/2024, dated 14.05.2024, pertaining to the appeal of the assessee Pranvera Stafa against decision no. 740, dated 08.03.2024 of the Independent Qualification Commission. The trial panel of this case shall consist of the following judges: Presiding: Rezarta Schuetz Rapporteur: Ina Rama Members: Albana Shtylla, Natasha Mulaj, Sokol Çomo The hearing in camera shall take place at the premises of the Appeal Chamber, at Boulevard “Dëshmorët e Kombit”, no. 3, Tirana.
| 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 - Public hearing
All day 2025.10.14 The Appeal Chamber held on 24.09.2025, at 10:00, the public hearing of case (JR) 12/2024, dated 29.03.2024, pertaining to the appeal of the Public Commissioner against decision no. 736, dated 31.01.2024 of the Independent Qualification Commission, related to the assessee Gentian Habazaj. The presiding judge announced that Article 179/b, paragraph 8 of the Constitution of the Republic of Albania and Article 199, second paragraph of the Civil Procedure Code have set forth the transfer of powers from the Public Commissioner to the Head of the Special Prosecution Office, represented in this case upon special authorization by the prosecutor of the Special Prosecution Office Mr. Adnan Xholi, present at the hearing. During the submission of the appeal grounds related to the asset assessment criterion, the representative of the Head of the Special Prosecution Office held that the financial analysis carried out by the Independent Qualification Commission is unsupported on the acts of the case file and that the assessee has failed to convincingly prove the legitimate sources of the assets in use and the coverage of the made investments. As to the proficiency assessment criterion, Mr. Xholi stated that the reasoning of the assessee for the undertaken investigative actions remain of poor quality, lack logical and legal argumentation, and are unsubstantiated on the acts of the investigative file. The representative of the Head of the Special Prosecution Office requested the Chamber to decide the amendment of decision no. 736, dated 31.01.2024 of the Independent Qualification Commission and the dismissal from office of the assessee Gentian Habazaj. During the submission of the objections, the assessee maintained that the appeal grounds do not stand, they are inconsistent with the evidence in the case file and that the conclusions drawn have been partially referred to the facts and documentation available. The assessee provided detailed explanations for each appeal ground related to the asset and proficiency assessment criteria and stated that the decision of the Independent Qualification Commission is fair, based on an in-depth investigation and should be upheld. In connection with the submissions, the assessee lodged some new acts, which the trial panel accepted as evidence. Subsequently, to the purpose of the consideration of the case, the case rapporteur addressed several questions to the parties. The representative of the Head of the Special Prosecution Office stated that he would provide responses in the final conclusions, while the assessee provided explanations with their regard. Once the parties declared that they had no other procedural requests, the trial panel decided to close the judicial investigation of the case and invited the parties to present their final conclusions. In order to give the parties time to prepare, it was decided to postpone the hearing on 14.10.2025, at 10:00. The public hearing shall take place at the premises of the Appeal Chamber, at Boulevard “Dëshmorët e Kombit”, no. 3, Tirana.
| 15 - Public hearing
All day 2025.10.15 The Appeal Chamber held on 29.09.2025, at 10:00, the public hearing of case (JR) 37/2023, dated 02.08.2023, pertaining to the appeal of the Public Commissioner against decision no. 650, dated 27.04.2023 of the Independent Qualification Commission, related to the assessee Ylli Pjetërnikaj. The presiding judge announced that Article 179/b, paragraph 8 of the Constitution of the Republic of Albania and Article 199, second paragraph, of the Civil Procedure Code have set forth the transfer of powers from the Public Commissioner to the Head of the Special Prosecution Office, represented in this case upon special authorization by the prosecutor of the Special Prosecution Office, Mr. Klodian Braho, present at the hearing. During the submission of the appeal grounds, the representative of the Head of the Special Prosecution Office stated that the assessee has made an incorrect declaration of assets and is found in terms of financial incapacity to justify the legitimacy of the income, to such an extent that the principle of objectivity and proportionality cannot be applied. With regard to the proficiency assessment, Mr. Klodian Braho held that the assessee failed to prove the opposite of the burden of proof for the findings included in the appeal regarding the investigative actions undertaken by him. The representative of the Head of the Special Prosecution Office requested the Appeal Chamber to take into account the appeal grounds, ruling on the amendment of decision no. 650, dated 27.04.2023 of the Independent Qualification Commission and the dismissal from office of the assessee Ylli Pjetërnikaj. The assessee objected to the appeal grounds, providing detailed explanations for each of them, whereas his legal representative stated that the essential income of the agricultural household cannot be zeroed, as long as there is no case, even suspected, of any corrupt activity of the assessee. The assessee requested the opening of the judicial investigation, accepting as evidence the acts attached to the submissions, as well as a new document lodged during today’s hearing. As to the denunciations, the representative of the Head of the Special Prosecution Office maintained that they contain no circumstances of interest for the trial. The assessee stated that in this context, he shares the same position as the representative of the Head of the Special Prosecution Office. The trial panel decided to open the judicial investigation of the case, accepting as evidence all the acts filed according to the today’s hearing minutes, apart from one document, for which it provided the assessee the opportunity to lodge it in the form required by law before the subsequent hearing. After being consulted, the trial panel decided not to investigate further the denunciations, as they fail to meet the criteria of Article 53 of Law no. 84/2016. The trial panel decided to postpone the hearing to 15.10.2025, at 09:00, a hearing during which the parties will present their final conclusions. The public hearing shall take place at the premises of the Appeal Chamber, at Boulevard “Dëshmorët e Kombit”, no. 3, Tirana.
| 16 - Public hearing
All day 2025.10.16 Today on 29.09.2025, at 13:00, the Special Appeals Chamber held the public hearing on the case (JR) 38/2023, dated 04.09.2023, pertaining to the appeal of the Public Commissioner filed against the decision of the Independent Qualification Commission no. 673, dated 15.06.2023, rendered for the assessee Mirela Zavalani. The presiding judge of the trial panel announced that Article 179/b, paragraph 8 of the Constitution of the Republic of Albania has dictated the transfer of powers from the Public Commissioner to the Head of the Special Prosecution Office. Pursuant to Article 199, paragraph 2 of the Civil Procedure Code, the trial panel decided to transfer the procedural proceedings from the Public Commissioner to the Head of the Special Prosecution Office, represented in this case with special authorization by the prosecutor of the Special Prosecution Office, Mr. Adnan Xholi, who was present at the hearing. During the submission of the appeal grounds on the asset assessment criterion, the representative of the Head of the Special Prosecution Office assessed that the declarations of the assessee, Mrs. Mirela Zavalani, are unclear and contradictory in relation to the acts in the file, making her declarations unreliable, inaccurate, and making it impossible to examine the lawfulness of the sources of her assets and those of the related persons. Mr. Adnan Xholi requested the Appeals Chamber to take into consideration the appeal grounds, demanding the opening of a judicial investigation for new evidence to be received during this process, in order to reach a fair conclusion on the case. Further on, the assessee Mrs. Mirela Zavalani and her legal representative, provided detailed explanations for each of the appeal grounds and requested the Appeals Chamber to open the judicial investigation of the case, accepting as evidence the new acts attached to the submissions, for which they stated they clarify every unclear circumstance of the administrative investigation carried out by the Independent Qualification Commission, as well as convincingly supporting the standard of reliability of the assessee in her declarations. Following the consultation, the trial panel decided to open the judicial investigation of the case, accepting as evidence the written acts specified by the assessee in the written submissions filed as well as in the inventory of evidence attached to these submissions. After the parties declared that they had no other procedural requests, the trial panel decided to close the judicial investigation of the case and invited the parties to present their final conclusions at the subsequent hearing scheduled to be held on 16.10.2025, at 8:30 a.m. The public hearing shall be held at the premises of the Special Appeals Chamber, at: Bulevardi “Dëshmorët e Kombit”, nr. 3, Tirana.
| 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 - Public hearing
All day 2025.10.28 On Tuesday, 28.10.2025, at 10:00, the Special Appeals Chamber shall adjudicate in public hearing the case (JR) no. 47/2023, dated 19.10.2023, corresponding to the appeal of the Public Commissioner filed against the decision of the Independent Qualification Commission no. 689, dated 24.07.2023 rendered for the assessee Ervin Pollozhani. The trial panel for the adjudication of this case is composed of judges: Presiding judge: Ina Rama Case Rapporteur: Albana Shtylla Members: Mimoza Tasi, Rezarta Schuetz, Sokol Çomo The public hearing shall be held at the premises of the Special Appeals Chamber, at: Bulevardi “Dëshmorët e Kombit”, nr. 3, Tirana.
| 29 - Camera hearing
All day 2025.10.29 On Wednesday, 29.10.2025, at 10:00, the Special Appeals Chamber shall review in camera the case (JR) no. 24/2023, dated 05.06.2023, corresponding to the appeal filed by the assessee Besnik Shehu against the decision of the Independent Qualification Commission no. 641, dated 06.04.2023. The trial panel for the review of this case is composed of judges: Presiding judge: Ina Rama Case Rapporteur: Mimoza Tasi Members: Natasha Mulaj, Rezarta Schuetz, Sokol Çomo The hearing in camera shall be held at the premises of the Special Appeals Chamber, at: Bulevardi “Dëshmorët e Kombit”, nr. 3, Tirana.
| 30 - Camera hearing
All day 2025.10.30 On Thursday, 30.10.2025, at 10:00, the Special Appeals Chamber shall review in camera the case (JR) no. 28/2024, dated 19.07.2024, corresponding to the appeal filed by the assessee Agron Zhukri against the decision of the Independent Qualification Commission no. 759, dated 19.04.2024. The trial panel for the review of this case is composed of judges: Presiding judge: Sokol Çomo Case Rapporteur: Natasha Mulaj Members: Albana Shtylla, Ina Rama, Mimoza Tasi The hearing in camera shall be held at the premises of the Special Appeals Chamber, at: Bulevardi “Dëshmorët e Kombit”, nr. 3, Tirana.
| 31 | November | November |