Subject: Challenging decision no. 284, dated 17.07.2023 of the High Prosecutorial Council “On issuing the disciplinary measure against the prosecutor Sali Hasa”.
Registration date: 03.11.2023
Lodged by: Petitioner Sali Hasa
Interested party: High Prosecutorial Council
Object: Challenging decision no. 284, dated 17.07.2023 of the High Prosecutorial Council “On issuing the disciplinary measure against the prosecutor Sali Hasa”.
Preliminary review panel:
Judge: Ina Rama
Judge: Mimoza Tasi
Case Rapporteur: Natasha Mulaj
Status: Under preparation to consideration
Subject: Finding the absolute invalidity of decision no. 117, dated 17.09.2001, of the High Council of Justice.
Registration date: 30.03.2023
Lodged by: Petitioner Majlinda Salillari (Mançellari)
Interested party: High Judicial Council
Object: Finding the absolute invalidity of decision no. 117, dated 17.09.2001, of the High Council of Justice.
Preliminary Review Panel:
Judge: Natasha Mulaj
Judge: Rezarta Schuetz
Case rapporteur: Mimoza Tasi
On Thursday, 09.11.2023, at 10:00, a plenary session on the basis of documents was held for the case (JD) 2/2023, dated 30.03.2023. The next session took place on 15.12.2023, at 09:30. The decision taken on 15.12.2023 was announced on 15.01.2024.
Status: Concluded (Decision)
Subject: – Challenging the High Judicial Council (formerly, HCJ), for the Disciplinary Procedure (JD) decision no. 100, dated 16.07.2014.
– Finding it a decision contrary to the law, in violation of legal and constitutional provisions (supported on the legal norms of the time, and the legal norms in force), for disciplinary proceedings (JD) against judges, and its repealing as an unlawful decision.
– Obligation of the High Judicial Council (former HCJ), to pay to the petitioner Shtjefën Lleshi the salary in the amount of 50%, as well as the accrued interest.
Registration date: 15.02.2023
Lodged by: Petitioner Shtjefën Lleshi
Respondents or interested parties: High Judicial Council
Object:
– Challenging the High Judicial Council (formerly, HCJ), for the Disciplinary Procedure (JD) decision no. 100, dated 16.07.2014.
– Finding it a decision contrary to the law, in violation of legal and constitutional provisions (supported on the legal norms of the time, and the legal norms in force), for disciplinary proceedings (JD) against judges, and its repealing as an unlawful decision.
– Obligation of the High Judicial Council (former HCJ), to pay to the petitioner Shtjefën Lleshi the salary in the amount of 50%, as well as the accrued interest.
Preliminary Review Panel:
Judge: Sokol Çomo
Judge: Ina Rama
Case Rapporteur: Albana Shtylla
Following the request of judge Sokol Çomo to recuse from the trial of the case, such a request accepted unanimously by decision no. 1, dated 11.05.2023, of the Meeting of Judges of the Appeal Chamber composed of judges: Albana Shtylla (president), Natasha Mulaj, Ina Rama, Rezarta Schuetz and Mimoza Tasi (members), the panel of judges of the Preliminary Review Panel of case (JD) no. 1/2023, dated 15.02.2023, shall be composed of the following judges:
Case Rapporteur: Albana Shtylla
Judge: Ina Rama
Judge: Natasha Mulaj
Following the request of judge Natasha Mulaj to recuse from the trial of the case, such a request accepted unanimously by decision no. 1, dated 11.05.2023, of the Meeting of Judges of the Appeal Chamber composed of judges: Albana Shtylla (president), Sokol Çomo, Ina Rama, Rezarta Schuetz and Mimoza Tasi (members), the panel of judges of the Preliminary Review Panel of case (JD) no. 1/2023, dated 15.02.2023, shall be composed of the following judges:
Case Rapporteur: Albana Shtylla
Judge: Ina Rama
Judge: Mimoza Tasi
Status: Under preparation to review