- Decision no. 70, dated 03.06.2026; including the concurring opinions; petitioner Artan Hajredinaj; revision of decision no. 39, dated 14.05.2025 of the Special Appeal Chamber
- Decision no. 66, dated 24.03.2026; including the concurring opinions; including the dissenting opinion; petitioner Dritan Rreshk; revision of decision no. 15, dated 17.07.2019 of the Special Appeal Chamber
- Decision no. 65, dated 24.03.2026; including the concurring opinions; petitioner Dritan Peka: review of decision no. 27, dated 22.10.2020 of the Appeal Chamber
- Decision no. 63, dated 24.03.2026; including concurring opinions; petitioner Kastriot Gramshi: review of decision no. 8, dated 02.03.2023 of the Appeal Chamber
- Decision no. 61, dated 24.03.2026, including the concurring opinions and the dissenting opinion; petitioner Arben Dollapaj; revision of decision no. 4, dated 12.03.2020 of the Special Appeal Chamber
- Decision no. 56, dated 24.03.2026; including the concurring opinions; including the dissenting opinion; petitioner Astrit Faqolli: revision of decision no. 9, dated 18.04.2019 of the Special Appeal Chamber
- Decision no. 55, dated 24.03.2026; including concurring opinions and the dissenting opinion; petitioner Alma Brati: review of decision no. 14, dated 09.07.2019 of the Appeal Chamber
- Decision no. 53, dated 11.03.2026; including the concurring opinions; including the dissenting opinion; petitioner Alfred Agolli; revision of decision no. 19, dated 13.07.2021 of the Special Appeal Chamber
- Decision no. 52, dated 11.03.2026; including concurring opinions, petitioner Shkëlzen Cena: review of decision no. 36, dated 16.12.2020 of the Appeal Chamber
- Decision no. 51, dated 11.03.2026; including concurring opinions; petitioner Artor Ylli: review of decision no. 31, dated 20.11.2019 of the Appeal Chamber
- Decision no. 50, dated 11.03.2026; including the concurring opinions; petitioner Elbana Lluri: revision of decision no. 26, dated 06.07.2022 of the Special Appeal Chamber
- Decision no. 49, dated 11.03.2026; including the concurring opinions; including the dissenting opinion; petitioner Bujar Hoti; revision of decision no. 22, dated 16.09.2019 of the Special Appeal Chamber
- Decision no. 48, dated 11.03.2026; including the concurring opinions; petitioner Adriatik Cama: revision of decision no. 5, dated 18.02.2019 of the Special Appeal Chamber
- Decision no. 47, dated 11.03.2026; including the concurring opinions, petitioner Luan Kaloçi; revision of decision no. 8, dated 23.10.2018 of the Special Appeal Chamber
- Decision no. 46, dated 11.03.2026; petitioner Fatos Lulo: revision of decision no. 3, dated 17.07.2018 of the Special Appeal Chamber (Announcement)
- Decision no. 45, dated 10.03.2026; petitioner Admir Thanza: revision of decision no. 10, dated 18.04.2019 of the Special Appeal Chamber